Target environment
Make document-heavy administrative work easier to review and prove.
For qualified partners working on non-clinical evidence, documentation, workflow, and administrative operations. Production use requires the appropriate privacy, security, contracts, and professional oversight.
Potential use cases
Start with one measurable workflow.
The first project should be bounded enough to deliver, evaluate, and operate without a broad system replacement.
Referral and order intake
Policy-to-proof workflows
Administrative quality and exception reporting
Worked example
Which requirement is unsupported, and does the record actually prove it?
Source, licence and limits
Can the record actually support each requirement? Every gap cites the FHIR element behind it, and says who may close it.
SourcesFHIR resourcesEncounter · Composition · CarePlan · ServiceRequest
NigatEvidence and exception layerValidate · cite · tier · route
OutputReviewer queueResolve unsupported requirements
Traceability
FHIR resources to requirements
SupportedNeeds a reviewerUnsupported
Nigat evidence engineValidate and tier
Ready
Click any resource, requirement, or row to open the evidence behind it. Structural rules are read from the published FHIR R4 StructureDefinitions.
| Requirement | Evidence source | Rule | Decided by | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading FHIR R4 element definitions… | ||||
Start with the operating problem
Show us where the work slows down.
You do not need a polished technical brief. Describe the decision, handoff, report, document workflow, or AI initiative that is harder than it should be.